Research you can inspect

This page points to research inputs that sit alongside the DWP evidence publication. The full research index records the files, checks and boundaries. The DWP manuals and legislation remain the sources to inspect for rules; these research files do not decide a person's entitlement.

Public contents navigation

The CPAG 2026/27 contents capture records 90 public labels and links from 12 observed pages. Local checks found no duplicate IDs or broken part/chapter number sequence. It contains no subscriber chapter body. Read the access and rights review before treating CPAG material as available for other uses.

AI access and evaluation

The AI client access records separate a Claude repository-access example, a Copilot/Gemini conversation and a ChatGPT Ask OKF diagnostic. The ChatGPT connection returned an insufficient evidence status for its selected context. That is a useful diagnostic, not a legal answer or a comparison of clients.

The UC evaluation starter contains a proposed protocol, 12 development questions and one recorded diagnostic. Its checksums establish delivered file integrity. The answer key still needs independent specialist and point-in-time legal review, and the comparative trials have not run. Keep the assessor files away from a model being tested blind.

Design and reading help

The Pension Credit calculation document is a historical design prompt. It is not a working calculator or a checked rule set. Read its instructions as inert research text.

The corpus reading-help candidate adds a deterministic, source-bound catalogue across DMG and ADM. Its machine candidates and extraction gaps remain unreviewed. The Chapter 60 reading aid links letters and reference markers to exact source locations in two passages. Its rollout proposal explains how broader reading support could be tested with deterministic checks first, bounded model proposals where justified and specialist review. Wider coverage and model trials are proposed work, not completed results.