staff-030: How does IIDB relate to PIP?
Awaiting specialist review · evidence insufficient · no AI answer.
This is a review aid made from independently located source candidates. It does not alter Ask OKF retrieval.
Review needs
- PIP/IIDB entitlement, payment and attendance-related overlap evidence; not a generic graph association alone.
- PIP component and IIDB supplements, jurisdiction and type of relationship are unspecified.
Candidate evidence
source-c040: DMG Vol 11 Ch 69: Disablement benefits — PDF page 3
Official source · Exact excerpt and hashes
IIDB conditions and historical claim-date distinctions; not a whole interoperability rule set.
69010 To become entitled to IIDB an employed earner must establish that
1. as a result of an IA, a loss of physical or mental faculty occurs for which disablement is assessed at not
less than 14%1or
2. as a result of more than one accident, losses of physical or mental faculty occur, for each of which
disablement is assessed at less than 14% but which in total amount to 14% or more 2or
3. in pneumoconiosis and byssinosis cases, disablement is assessed, or treated as assessed, at not less
than 1%3or
4. in the case of claims for occupational deafness, disablement is assessed at not less than 20% 4.
1 SS CB Act 92, s 103(1); 2 s 103(2)(a)(b); 3 SS (II) (PD) Regs, reg 20; 4 reg 34(6)
Provision of NINO
69011 For IIDB there is a specific requirement1 for a claimant to provide sufficient information or
evidence to establish their NINO. See DMG 02172 et seq for full guidance.
1 SS A Act 92, s 1(1A) & (1B)
Excerpt omits 656 characters before and 0 after on this page. Check surrounding text and adjacent pages.
source-c041: DMG Vol 11 Ch 69: Disablement benefits — PDF page 42
Official source · Exact excerpt and hashes
Industrial Injuries CAA candidate; must not be silently equated with a war-pension allowance.
69310 Entitlement to CAA may arise where
1. Dis P is paid in respect of 100% disablement1
2. there is entitlement to weekly payments under the relevant legislation2 or any certified contracting-
out scheme and the disablement would be assessed at 100% 3
3. certain former constables and fire-fighters are entitled to injury pension and the disablement would be
assessed at 100%4.
1 SS CB Act 92, 104(1); 2 Workmen’s Compensation Acts; 3 SS (Gen Ben) Regs, reg 43; 4 reg 44
69311 The medical adviser will advise on the need for constant attendance when they are considering an
IIDB referral and their recommended level of disablement is 95% or greater. In addition to the usual
medical reports on the claim for IIDB, the medical adviser will give specific medical advice about CAA on
form BI118D.
69312 While decisions on CAA can be reconsidered by the DM, there is no right of appeal against a
decision on CAA1 so it is important to consider all the relevant facts fully before making a decision.
1 SS CS (D&A) Regs, Sch 2, para 14(a)
69313 - 69319
Primary conditions
69320 The primary conditions for a grant of CAA 1 are
1. the claimant’s disablement resulting from the relevant accident or disease must total at least 95% as
that percentage
1.1 is rounded to 100% and
1.2 is paid at the 100% rate and
1.3 may be made up by
Excerpt omits 117 characters before and 0 after on this page. Check surrounding text and adjacent pages.
source-c034: DMG Vol 3 Ch 17: Overlapping benefits — PDF page 11
Official source · Exact excerpt and hashes
Overlapping-benefit table continuation includes PIP daily living and attendance-related benefits; preceding definitions and exact scheme must be retained.
17086 The II and non-Act benefits referred to in Column 2 of DMG 17085 are
1. US and age related increases
2. CAA awarded under the II scheme1
3. any personal injuries scheme2 payment made under certain legislation3
4. any service pensions instrument (see DMG 17092)
5. the PB and MDB (see Benefit Specific Guidance)
6. the WC (Supp) (see Benefit Specific Guidance) the general benefit rules for former constables and
firefighters4
7. IDB5
8. war pension death benefit (see DMG 17095)
9. training allowances (see DMG 17101)
Excerpt omits 1,451 characters before and 0 after on this page. Check surrounding text and adjacent pages.
Observed retrieval
The retained run selected 60 records, using 451,047 bytes. It retained 1 of 3 independently located candidate pages. This measures candidate overlap, not substantive correctness.
Review checklist
- [ ] Resolve benefit, variant, time period and claimant circumstances without inventing missing facts.
- [ ] Check each exact source passage and its adjacent pages against the official PDF.
- [ ] Locate every condition, exception, qualification and cross-reference needed for the declared question.
- [ ] Reconcile relevant legislation, amendments, ADM/DMG regime and effective dates.
- [ ] Record each supported claim against exact evidence IDs, with contradicting or missing evidence separately.
- [ ] Keep the answer insufficient until evidence requirements and claim-level assessment justify a bounded conclusion.
Boundaries
- Research review pack, not an answer, an entitlement decision or a complete legal evidence bundle.
- Candidate selection is project-authored and unreviewed. It is independent of the retained retrieval run and is not injected into search or Ask OKF.
- Each excerpt is an exact bounded substring of frozen machine text, with offsets, a literal hash and a whole-page link. Its surrounding qualifications may be outside the excerpt or on adjacent pages.
- Machine extraction can damage tables, footnotes, spacing and reading order. Compare each material proposition with the original PDF, adjacent text and cited legislation.
- Original source roles, capture dates and historical limitations remain unchanged. Current applicability and specialist acceptance are not established.