OKF-DWP

Independent experimental publication. Not an official DWP service, benefits advice or an entitlement calculator.

View this version’s Markdown source

On this page

First structured-context comparison: acceptance failed

This is a retained development observation. It is not an answer-quality trial.

The same forty staff question occurrences, frozen source inventories, authored concepts and requirements were checked at both budgets. The single unknown-term control was evaluated separately. No model or network calls occurred.

Corpus Budget Questions with zero evidence Median evidence units Retained authored paths
logical-context 32 KiB 34/40 0 0/47
logical-context 512 KiB 0/40 13.5 47/47
structured-context 32 KiB 40/40 0 0/47
structured-context 512 KiB 0/40 33.5 40/47

Every result remained insufficient. More selected units do not establish greater relevance or a better answer. The candidate is not accepted for default adoption.

Failures and next action

Interpretation limits

These are known development cases, including duplicates. Timing is a local sequential cached-order observation with mixed cold and warm reads; it is not a controlled speed benchmark or remote latency. Structural and global integrity checks passed separately. They do not erase this delivery failure.

The JSON report records exact source, engine and input identities. All 164 context packages, the runner, progress and timings are retained beside this note.

Frozen reproduction location

Both source manifests and their generated shard bytes are retained at DWP commit 9736d30c. The engine is the immutable Explorer commit recorded in report.json; the exact runner is retained alongside the packages. Later producer revisions must not replace this trial or regrade its outcome.