OKF-DWP

Independent experimental publication. Not an official DWP service, benefits advice or an entitlement calculator.

View this version’s Markdown source

On this page

Independent reading of trial 06

The retained trial 06 results pass the bounded archive, source-conservation and relationship checks described here. This is acceptance of measured evidence delivery for the 40 staff question occurrences, not legal answerability or acceptance of the separate original imprisonment demonstration.

What was checked

An independently written audit read all 328 retained packages from trials 05 and 06. It made no assembly, source-acquisition, network or model calls. It did not import the evaluator's path or location-scoring helper. The pure, hash-bound concept resolver was used to check which declared public aliases activated each requirement.

The receipt records:

The supplement confirms that repeated source identifiers retain exactly the same full record across 4,209 selected source record occurrences. It also checks the generated comparison against the independent totals and binds the final protocol, runner, helper and manifests to source-freeze commit 350c60d8ba7bc83297aa85cdcfd7ddd2d5d789c7.

Results and trade-offs

Measure at 512 KiB Trial 05 Trial 06
Staff cases activating a source-read selection 21/40 37/40
Staff cases retaining source evidence 40/40 40/40
Inherited source-selection paths retained 47/47 47/47
Previously added source-selection paths retained 181/181 181/181
Newly added source-selection paths retained Not declared 208/208
Restored location-route incidences retained 490/765 469/765
Inferred location-route incidences retained 35/87 34/87
Original page-path incidences retained 52/776 52/776
Results marked insufficient 40/40 40/40

Path and route counts are case incidences, not distinct rules or measures of legal completeness. All larger staff packages report both retrieval and assembly truncation. All 40 structured staff packages at 32 KiB contain no source evidence. The audit preserves this failure; a smaller response must not be described as containing the omitted source.

The three questions without a source-read selection remain Staff 001, Staff 008 and Staff 018. The frozen question wording and engine are unchanged; the improvement is an additive source-selection increment, not an answer-quality or runtime-speed experiment.

Separate acceptance boundary

The original imprisonment and hospital questions are a different denominator. Their first separate acceptance run found incomplete delivery of the authored custody selection. This staff audit does not override that result or authorise claiming complete custody routing. Its failure and any later repair must stay visible in the separate original-acceptance record.

This review checks source extraction bytes and retained PDF hash identifiers. It does not re-render those PDFs, verify every boundary's meaning, certify current law, close legal applicability questions or establish specialist acceptance, model-answer accuracy, affordability or public deployment.

Reproduce without overwriting this receipt

Use an isolated scratch checkout containing the frozen files. Keep this checkout and its receipts unchanged. In the scratch checkout only, move independent-review.json to a unique temporary archive before running:

node --experimental-strip-types \
  evaluation/manual-structure/context-probe/analysis-06/independent-audit.mjs \
  --explorer-root /path/to/okf-explorer-at-the-admitted-engine

The script refuses to overwrite an earlier receipt. It reads historical trial 05 files from the retained Git commit when their current projection differs. It does not execute the context assembler.