# OKF Bundle Wiki Profile v1 Status: experimental implementation profile, updated 9 August 2026. This profile defines a federated publication contract for independently hosted Open Knowledge Format bundle wikis. It uses YAML-LD Basic profile semantics for authoring and publishes JSON-LD plus Explorer-compatible JSON projections. It is additive to the Markdown, provenance, trust, lifecycle and computation rules in OKF v0.2; a producer can conform to OKF core without adopting this profile. The profile URI is: `https://chris-page-gov.github.io/okf-explorer/profile/bundle-wiki/v1/` ## Required bundle surfaces - `okf-bundle.yamlld` — canonical semantic descriptor. - `okf-bundle.jsonld` — deterministic JSON-LD projection. - `okf-explorer.json` — current Explorer runtime descriptor. - `data/manifest.json` — counts, indexes, chunks and performance contract. - `context/okf-bundle-v1.jsonld` — pinned context copy. - `checksums.json` — generated artefact integrity metadata. When a complete semantic graph would make either root representation exceed a host or review boundary, the root YAML-LD and JSON-LD files are compact control documents. They point to a generated semantic manifest and bounded gzip JSON-LD shards. The manifest records the partition rule, counts, media types, compressed and expanded digests, and the assertion-set identity. Entity shards carry direct triples; assertion shards carry the matching evidence-bearing reification. A whole-manifest check must reconcile both sets exactly. The repository contract declares these surfaces with the `semantic-manifest`, `semantic-json-ld-shards`, `semantic-context`, and `relationship-schema` roles. The Reader may continue to use bounded runtime adjacency without making that delivery projection an independent semantic authority. A very large evidence-bearing relationship graph may additionally publish a SHA-256-bound `entrypoints.relationship_runtime` control manifest. Its `default_planes` must exactly equal the active authority planes; historical or rejected planes remain explicit but are never loaded by default. Each gzip runtime shard carries safe local `source`/`target` routes together with absolute `source_iri`/`target_iri`, predicate, assertion identity, evidence, rights and plane membership. A SHA-256 route locator maps one local route to a bounded set of shard paths and commits, per plane, to the exact count and digest of sorted incident assertion IDs. The Reader verifies the manifest, locator, shard bytes, row contract and route commitment before presenting the edges. It also enforces aggregate compressed-byte and retained-text budgets, decodes one rich shard at a time and retains only governed Reader fields so a bounded row/chunk count cannot become an unbounded browser-memory claim. Repository contracts declare these surfaces with the `relationship-runtime-manifest`, `relationship-route-locator`, `relationship-runtime-schema` and `relationship-runtime` roles. Every repository adopting or migrating towards this profile should also keep a root `okf.semantic.json` control file conforming to [`repository-contract.schema.json`](repository-contract.schema.json). This is an authoring/build contract, not a generated semantic serialisation. It makes the source boundary, current migration state, optional environment setup, exact build/check tooling and Reader delivery plane discoverable without pretending that descriptor-only YAML-LD is already a complete assertion graph. All contract paths and globs are repository-relative and must remain contained after symlink resolution. Tooling strings are untrusted declarations, not shell instructions: an agent or operator inspects and cross-checks them against trusted repository guidance or a reviewed preset before executing an approved command exactly. Cross-repository artefact inspection applies explicit on-disk and decoded-byte ceilings and reports malformed or unreadable sampled artefacts as errors rather than treating them as empty data. An optional `okf-explorer-presentation.v1` profile supplies provider-authored display defaults without changing OKF meaning or generated facet counts. A large descriptor may embed it in `extensions` or point to a `data/presentation.json` entrypoint. The profile schema is [`presentation.schema.json`](presentation.schema.json). Presentation is deliberately bundle-level and explicitly referenced. Explorer does not probe for implicit sidecars beside every `index.md`, because nested inheritance would otherwise be ambiguous and expensive. Route-scoped overrides are deferred until the matching and inheritance rules are specified. An optional snapshot-bound provider datapack can distinguish the governed metadata in a bundle from a named, bounded review of an external provider reference. The manifest and pack schemas are [`provider-datapack-manifest.schema.json`](provider-datapack-manifest.schema.json) and [`provider-datapack.schema.json`](provider-datapack.schema.json). These documents do not assert that an external reference is current live data; see the [provider datapack contract](../../../docs/provider-datapacks.md). An optional governed-term datapack makes the metadata vocabulary inspectable and testable. Its [`governed-terms.schema.json`](governed-terms.schema.json) registry records each compact identifier, full IRI, term kind, authoritative specification provenance, reader-facing definition, bounded application and emitted usage. The companion [`governed-term-validation.schema.json`](governed-term-validation.schema.json) report records the deterministic checks and their limitations. Large-corpus descriptors advertise these resources as `terms` and `term_validation` entrypoints. Explorer rejects namespace, provenance, identifier, snapshot or conformance contradictions before presenting the registry. ## Authoring rules - Use UTF-8 and YAML 1.2 Core Schema. - Follow OKF v0.2 reserved-file structure and declare `okf_version: "0.2"` at the bundle-root index. - Use `generated`, `sources`, `verified`, `status` and `stale_after` with their v0.2 meanings. `timestamp` is accepted only as a v0.1 compatibility field. - Use one YAML-LD document in each Markdown frontmatter block. - Give every production concept an absolute `@id`. - Use IRI-valued `@type` values; retain human labels separately. - Quote dates and timestamps even though conforming YAML-LD processors treat Core Schema date-looking values as strings. - Treat Markdown links as navigation or `dcterms:references`; domain predicates require explicit evidence. - Do not use comments, key order or YAML anchor names to carry meaning. - Give every material directed relationship a stable assertion IRI, absolute source, predicate and target IRIs, governed relationship kind, preferred and inverse labels, status, scope, authority, derivation, observation time, evidence and rights. - Require canonical credential-free HTTP(S) authority, evidence/resource and rights sources: no missing host, literal whitespace, quotes, malformed escapes, credentials, unsafe delimiters or out-of-range port. - Keep a safe local Explorer route separate from the absolute semantic IRI and compile both into runtime relationship rows. - Publish each governed relationship as a direct semantic triple and one evidence-bearing `okf:RelationshipAssertion`, or generate both deterministically from one assertion source. ## Authority classes Every generated or inferred statement must be distinguishable as one of: - official — directly published by the authoritative source; - normalized — deterministic projection/canonicalisation of official data; - inferred — rule-derived and accompanied by evidence/confidence; - model-derived — produced with model assistance and accompanied by passage evidence, model/method version, confidence and evaluation status. ## Compatibility `okf-explorer-bundle.v0` and `okf-explorer-large-corpus.v1` remain supported runtime projections. They are generated artefacts rather than the semantic authority. An Attested Computation contract is metadata. Neither the profile nor Explorer authorises or automatically invokes computation, executor or attester resources. ## Validation Release checks cover Markdown, YAML-LD representation constraints, JSON Schema, JSON-LD expansion using pinned contexts, compiled artefact reconciliation, search/adjacency integrity and live publication headers/deep links. The complete authoring and Reader explanation is [OKF 0.2 and YAML-LD semantic authoring](../../../docs/okf-0.2-yaml-ld-semantic-authoring.md). The normative upstream serialisation work is the [YAML-LD 1.0 Working Draft](https://www.w3.org/TR/yaml-ld-10/). This profile is an OKF application profile, not a claim that YAML-LD is already a W3C Recommendation.